One was the president of a nation, the other posts on an internet forum. Ckoerner ( talk) 14:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Captured social media posts aren't a source? You might.wanna try telling that to the, I dunno, all of Wikipedia. The rest are not RS and is what we'd call original research so I can't include them. The only reliable source you suggest is already referenced in the article. Acting out like a wanker does not meet general notability guidelines. And, again, I go back to my original argument: They've literally accomplished nothing to warrant a Wikipedia article. There's honestly just way, way too much crap on them that if you really went through it all, the Controversy and Criticism tab itself would dwarf anything and everything else on the page. and have taken disproportionate action against him after he criticized the site. ![]() ![]() ![]() For starters, - any talk of the game is outright banned, even though the lead problematic dev left. not have an article to begin with, but I can scare up two or three things to add. Ckoerner ( talk) 21:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Well, the idea is to. They're a footnote on NeoGAF's main page at best, and considering how many times this has happened 's inevitably that this page is gonna get deleted and/or merged. And, I'm gonna gingerly put my foot down on this, they don't deserve to be rewarded with a Wikipedia page for that. They've accomplished nothing of any significance, set no benchmarks of any kind, since their inception aside from their general toxicity and social media drama. As a community, it is just incredibly insignificant when it comes to gaming hubs when compared to reddit subs, individual company Discord servers, or hell, even Gamefaqs. That's all it is: A rebranding, and in terms of industry recognition, nowhere near the level of clout GAF used to have. Specifically: How many of those notable industry figures are active lol? More specifically: How many of those notable industry figures have been active in the past year? More more specifically: How many of those notable industry figures have been active in the past few years? ResetEra is an offshoot of NeoGAF - same people, same members, same drama, renamed in an effort to distance from a single person. It's leaving out the warts (only criticism is on David Jaffe's relationship, isn't), while overselling the other aspects, like the user ratio and notable industry figures who registered for the site. Ckoerner ( talk) 17:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Honestly, this article speaks like it was written by someone from that very forum itself. It has also been referred to by RS "one of the internet's largest video game forums"" If others disagree, let's discuss why. While web rankings are suspect ,ResetEra is a magnitude larger than its predecessor, NeoGaf by multiple analytical tools. ![]() I've reviewed the previous incarnation of the article and updated it where I could. "Since 2019 the site has grown and its impact on the industry has increased. As I stated in my edit summary I felt the subject met the criteria of inclusion in the encyclopedia. 4 Games that have been announced on ResetEra.3 Why does this article ignore pretty much all and any of the severe criticism against Resetera? This article makes it sound like a helpful, positive website.1 Why is this a separate article again?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |